About your Search

20130318
20130326
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3
that is where the energy should go. the other end will take care of itself, if you can figure out some way, and i hope you do, break down those crazy wages for the c o's. host: what would you do? -- ceo's? host: what would you do? caller: i am not that smart. i wish that i knew. guest: one way would be to give shareholders the power to approve or disapprove, rubber- stamp top executive compensations for the president's and ceo's of these companies. you can believe that's these individual pension funds would never let these corporate executives get away with what they're getting away with. we have a moral compact in this country historic with that workers should get a minimum wage that meet their basic and essential necessities. if they are more productive because of automation and working twice as hard, they should share in those benefits. after all, those productive automations are written down very rapidly by crook -- but political pressure. it is a very mixed situation. i have to say, just from a decency point of view, the golden rule, never mind any laws, how can we a lot -- how can we
. we would be wise to invest in more resilient infrastructure, n sustainible nonfossil energy sources. we as a country should rise to the challenge. the united states is not a poor impoverished nation, we are just acting like one. we should be investing as if we believe there is a future for us. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. for what purpose does the gentleman from texas rise? mr. olson: mr. speaker, i ask unanimous consent to address the house for one minute and to revise and extend my remarks. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentleman is recognized for one minute. mr. speaker, i rise today in strong support of the house republican budget. when a family racks up debt, it can take decades to pay off. the interest alone can add up to thousands of dollars. that's money that could be spent on braces, college tuition or bigger home. the same is true for government. ignoring our debt will force us to break promises we made to seniors and the poor. we won't be able to protect medicare, medicaid and social security for those who need it. the house
powerful compared to even nuclear-weapons in terms of the amount of energy that the idea of modifying them is a daunting proposition. even if we are thinking in non- military terms about hurricanes, my understanding of the problem is that we are quite a ways away from being able to do that. one thing we do not understand is the implications of any intervention leawood try to carry out. these weather systems are intervention we would try to carry up. these budde systems are enormous. not since the debate is not important for the issue is irrelevant. i think we are a ways away from being able to do things with the weather. host: this point on our twitter host: let us go to ramie from baltimore, maryland. caller: a couple of quick points. i think we are talking about a missile system that is designed to do impact on the u.s.. am in the national shipping business. i have always contended that our biggest worry should be pakistan. the reason i am saying that is we have the caliban and al caliban al have the qaeda acquiring weapons through them. these containers to not even have to come off the
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)